There have been controversies surrounding Hunter Biden, including his business dealings in Ukraine and China. These controversies were subjects of political discussions and media scrutiny during the election period. The current atmosphere with these business dealings include the fact that “then” vice president Joe Biden most likely would’ve known about such business dealings. The public believes there’s a high chance that Joe Biden did not just know about them, but he may have been involved. Although there is no hard evidence of this matter the discussion arises that a United States former vice president and current president could have potentially used his son as a method to obtain money from other countries using the United States’ influence.
Hunter Biden’s Business Dealings in Ukraine
One of the major controversies involving Hunter Biden is his involvement with a Ukrainian energy company called Burisma Holdings. In 2014, while his father, Joe Biden, was serving as Vice President of the United States, Hunter joined the board of Burisma Holdings, which was known for its involvement in the energy sector.
The timing of Hunter Biden’s appointment raised concerns as it coincided with Ukraine facing intense scrutiny amid corruption allegations and geopolitical tensions with Russia. Some critics alleged that his position on the board was potentially influenced by his father’s political position, as Joe Biden was involved in handling U.S. foreign policy matters related to Ukraine at the time.
However, various investigations, including those conducted by Ukrainian and international authorities, did not find any evidence of wrongdoing on Hunter Biden’s part in relation to his work with Burisma. Despite this, the controversy persisted, and it became a talking point during the 2020 presidential election. It also stands that if Ukraine was involved with corruption allegations, then there is a large chance that the information may never come to surface as some Ukraine citizens could have been involved in the controversy.
There are several reasons cited for his appointment to the board:
- Name Recognition: Hunter Biden’s last name and his father’s political status likely contributed to his appointment. Having a prominent American figure on the board could potentially enhance Burisma’s reputation and improve its business prospects.
- Connections and Influence: Some critics speculated that Hunter Biden’s position on the board might have been influenced by his father’s role as Vice President, and that his appointment could have been seen as a way to gain favor with the U.S. government and access to influential networks.
- Business Expertise: While Hunter Biden did not have extensive experience in the energy sector, he had experience as a lawyer and businessman, which might have been seen as valuable in terms of legal and business matters for the company.
Hunter Biden’s Business Dealings in China
Another aspect of controversy involves Hunter Biden’s business dealings in China. In 2013, he co-founded a private equity firm called BHR Partners. The firm was established with the participation of Chinese state-owned entities, including the Bank of China.
Critics raised concerns about potential conflicts of interest and alleged that his business dealings in China could have been influenced by his father’s political status. However, like in the case of Ukraine, there was no evidence of illegal activities found, but the issue was politically contentious and raised questions about transparency and ethics. China is also riddled with corruption and is a communist country making it very unlikely to obtain credible information from the source.
It is essential to note that allegations and controversies surrounding Hunter Biden’s business dealings have been a subject of partisan and political debate. Some viewed them as politically motivated attempts to discredit his father, Joe Biden, while others were concerned about potential conflicts of interest. It is essential to refer to reputable and up-to-date sources to understand the latest developments and the outcomes of any investigations related to these matters.
Hunter Biden’s involvement with BHR Partners, a private equity firm in China, has also been a subject of controversy and speculation. Here are some key points regarding his connection to BHR Partners:
- Co-Founding BHR Partners: In 2013, Hunter Biden co-founded BHR Partners, a private equity firm focused on investing in various sectors in China. He founded the firm in collaboration with other partners, including Chinese state-owned entities, such as the Bank of China.
- Lack of Prior Energy Experience: Similar to his involvement with Burisma Holdings in Ukraine, Hunter Biden did not have prior experience in the energy or financial sectors in China. His background was in law and business, and he did not have a strong background in the industries in which BHR Partners was involved.
- Political Connections: Hunter Biden’s last name and his father’s political status as the Vice President of the United States likely contributed to his involvement with BHR Partners. Some critics raised concerns about potential conflicts of interest and speculated that his connections might have influenced the firm’s business dealings in China.
- Allegations of Influence: Some critics alleged that Hunter Biden’s association with BHR Partners could have provided Chinese entities with access to influential networks and potentially impacted U.S.-China relations. However, like with his role at Burisma, no evidence of illegal activities related to his work with BHR Partners has been proven.
New Information FD-1023
There has been new information which has leaked regarding the Biden family and their business dealings in Ukraine. Charles E. Grassley a United States Republican senator released an unclassified document from the FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation) showing that both Joe Biden and Hunter Biden were equally paid $5,000,000 dollars to protect Burisma from corruption charges. Victor Shokin at the time of 2015 to 2016 was the prosecutor in Ukraine who was allegedly investigating Burisma about corruption cases.
In interviews with senior officials in Ukraine they did state that there was an altercation involving president Biden who threatened a $1 billion dollar loan to the country if they did not remove Victor Shokin. It appears at the time that president Obama must have known about the incidence. However, a CNN article stated that the fact check of the event was false due to Ukraine officials stating this did not happen. The fact check claimed that Shokin’s deputy Vitaliy Kasko stated that the investigation into Burisma at the time was dormant.
Regardless of these statements the new document labeled FD-1023 took a year for Charles E. Grassley to obtain even though it wasn’t a classified document. He released it to the public on Twitter allowing for the audiences of America to witness the document first-hand. The accounts in the document were extremely specific showing that the Biden family most likely did receive a payment from the Burisma board in some sort of method. The document also states that the board allowed Hunter Biden to join even though they considered him a moron to get protection from the United States in case any scandal broke out. It appears that the statements made in the document corroborate correctly to everything that has happened so far.
Conclusion
Now there has been newly known information from IRS whistleblowers into Hunter Biden and his father/president Joe Biden. The whistleblowers were questioned by the House Committee on the information they have decided to provide. The whistleblowers stated that their investigation into Hunter Biden and Joe Biden (The Big Guy) was essentially sabotaged by the United States attorney in Delaware as well as other US attorneys. Department of Justice officials wanted to throw away the investigation rather than diving into it from the whistleblower’s statements. They also stated that interviews were not allowed to be done without limitations and the witnesses were told of the interviews prior to them occurring.
This renewed the allegations that Joe Biden may have been involved with Hunter Biden’s bussiness dealings with other countries. Of course it’s important to state that the Republicans may benefit from this information as it can potentially harm Joe Biden’s reputation. However, this is only a near-sighted approach to this matter. The most crucial part is that a vice president may have corroborated with his son to do business dealings with countries who want to harm the United States as a whole. Ideally this makes it much worse as the President of the United States is also Joe Biden at this point in time meaning he may be subject to hand over US intelligence to countries such as China and Ukraine. He may also be willing to hand over money from taxpayers to pay off the money he received from the business deals involving his son Hunter Biden.
People also believe that Hunter Biden has had unfair treatment with the Justice System. Hunter appears in theory to be able to do anything he wants and can get away with anything. The public also scrutinizes these decisions as Donald Trump received a much more unfair treatment as he’s continuously hit with indictment after indictment. Fact of the matter is that people are losing trust in our justice system and the waves it can send may skyrocket new ideals into what the justice department’s credibility really is. Let’s not forget the incriminating evidence which was recovered from Hunter Biden’s Laptop which was completely ignored by the FBI for months until the New York Post decided to share the story. In which they were completely shadow banned with the label of Russian disinformation put on their piece. Reality is that the laptop was real and was not Russian disinformation.