In the lead-up to the 2020 U.S. Presidential election, a controversy arose over Hunter Biden’s laptop allegedly belonging to him, the son of then-candidate Joe Biden. The laptop, which was reportedly dropped off at a Delaware computer repair shop in April 2019, was said to contain emails, photographs, and videos that raised questions about Hunter Biden’s business dealings in Ukraine and China, as well as his personal life.
The story first emerged in October 2020, when the New York Post published a series of articles based on the contents of the laptop. The Post’s reporting alleged that Hunter Biden had introduced his father, then Vice President Joe Biden, to a top executive at a Ukrainian energy company, Burisma Holdings, where Hunter had served on the board of directors. The reporting also alleged that Hunter Biden had used his father’s position to enrich himself through business dealings in China.
The story quickly gained traction on social media, with many supporters of President Donald Trump using it to attack the Biden family and cast doubt on Joe Biden’s fitness for office. However, the story also drew criticism from many media outlets and political figures, who raised questions about the provenance of Hunter Biden’s laptop and the veracity of its contents.
Origins of Hunter Biden’s Laptop
The story of the Hunter Biden’s laptop began in April 2019, when Hunter reportedly dropped off a laptop at a Delaware computer repair shop, but never returned to retrieve it. According to the shop’s owner, John Paul Mac Isaac, he contacted the FBI after discovering what he believed to be incriminating emails and photographs on the laptop.
In December 2019, Mac Isaac reportedly made a copy of the laptop’s hard drive and gave it to an associate of Rudy Giuliani, the former New York City mayor and personal attorney to President Trump. Giuliani has claimed that he obtained the hard drive in order to investigate allegations of corruption involving the Biden family.
In September 2020, the New York Post obtained a copy of the hard drive and began publishing articles based on its contents. The Post’s reporting alleged that the emails and other materials on Hunter Biden’s laptop showed evidence of Hunter Biden’s involvement in corrupt business dealings in Ukraine and China, and suggested that Joe Biden may have been aware of and possibly involved in these activities.
The Post’s reporting was immediately controversial, with many media outlets and political figures questioning the authenticity of the emails and the veracity of the allegations. Some experts also raised concerns about the possibility that the laptop had been tampered with or manipulated in some way.
Verification and Fact-Checking
In the days following the Post’s initial reporting on Hunter Biden’s laptop, many media outlets and fact-checkers began investigating the authenticity of the emails and other materials on the laptop. Some of the key findings included:
- The authenticity of the emails and other materials could not be independently verified.
- Many of the emails and other materials had been selectively edited or taken out of context, making it difficult to determine their true meaning.
- The metadata on the files suggested that they had been created and modified in ways that were inconsistent with normal usage patterns, leading some experts to suggest that they may have been manipulated in some way.
- Some of the key claims made in the Post’s reporting, such as the allegation that Joe Biden had met with a Burisma executive at Hunter’s request, were not supported by the evidence.
As a result of these findings, many media outlets and fact-checkers concluded that the allegations made in the Post’s reporting were unverified or misleading, and that the story was being used by some to spread misinformation and influence the election. Essentially they stated that the Hunter Biden’s laptop story was full of holes and inconclusive to being true. This was a massive misstep for fact checkers as at the end Hunter Biden’s laptop was confirmed to be true.
Political Fallout
The controversy over the Hunter Biden’s laptop quickly became a major issue in the 2020 U.S. Presidential election. Supporters of President Trump seized on the story as evidence of corruption within the Biden family, and argued that Joe Biden was unfit for office due to his alleged involvement in these activities. Meanwhile, supporters of Joe Biden argued that the story was a politically motivated smear campaign designed to damage his campaign.
The controversy also had real-world consequences for some of the key players involved. John Paul Mac Isaac, the owner of the Delaware computer repair shop where the laptop was allegedly dropped off, became the subject of harassment and death threats after his identity was revealed in the media. In addition, the FBI reportedly began investigating whether Rudy Giuliani had acted as an agent of a foreign power in his efforts to obtain and disseminate the contents of Hunter Biden’s laptop.
Despite the controversy, Joe Biden won the 2020 U.S. Presidential election, defeating incumbent President Trump. Since taking office, Biden has faced questions about his son’s business dealings, but has denied any wrongdoing on his part or on the part of his family. He has also called for an independent investigation into the matter, and has pledged to restore the integrity of the U.S. government.
Mainstream Media, FBI, and Social Media Suppression
The reality of the situation is that even with the original fact checks the truth of the story came out on top. Sadly, a lie will reach the entire globe before truth can put it’s pants on. So what exactly happened to the story after it was released originally by the New York Post? The story faced massive scrutiny by the left who fought for Biden’s administration. The laptop was told to the public that it was a Russian disinformation campaign which turned out to be not true.
Early on when the New York Post published the story on Hunter Biden’s laptop it was heavily suppressed by social media with additional involvement from the FBI. In many news stories today it has become known that during the 2020 election, the story was not mentioned on major mainstream media outlets who support the Democrats other known as the left. Social media platforms including Twitter and Facebook also reduced the laptop story to misinformation and disinformation.
The importance is that the public should no longer trust media sources from the left including, but not limited to NPR, BBC, CNN, ABC, MSNBC, NBC, CBS, NY Times, Google News, and PBS. As these mainstream news outlets have provided incorrect information to the public to further their ruler’s agenda which includes Democrats and the left. Its hard to take them seriously anymore especially with their continued and conspired efforts to force their agenda on American’s nationwide.
Another important thing to note is to distrust social media platforms including, but not limited to Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram as they worked with the FBI to mute the new information provided by the New York Post. Especially because over the years it appears that the Hunter Biden’s Laptop story was true, but the reach died down on the topic due to confounding factors with the involvement of those social media companies.
The Right and The Left
Now its important to understand the the right leaning news outlets such as Fox and New York Post shouldn’t be trusted due to the fact they did not suppress Hunter Biden’s Laptop story. It was essentially in their agenda to support Donald Trump’s candidacy by reporting on this news. What would happen if there was a different story involving Donald Trump’s children? Would this story be hidden from the masses and only covered by the Left?
Continue to read up on every story and do not trust news outlets, social media, or fact checkers to do your job for you. It’s been shown time and time again that every institution has their own agenda and will not report on matters that go contrary to the overall narrative. Remember that the top one percent of the world will continue to hold whatever narrative they want as they provide funding to popular and established institutions such as the Hunter Biden’s Laptop story.
Similar echoes occurred in this matter regarding the COVID-19 lab leak conspiracy which turns out may have been true all along. However, it’s strictly necessary to state that mainstream outlets such as the left leaning media and social media platforms would suppress information about the lab leak theory. Many scientists worldwide including Fauci also had an ulterior motive to hide and mute the lab leak story. Do not trust government institutions, fact checkers, social media, or mainstream media just because they have established roots.
Do not listen to other people regarding the phrase “do your own research” which became mocked and laughed at, beginning from the COVID-19 pandemic. This doesn’t directly involve Hunter Biden’s laptop story, but it has massive implications that come with it. As many groups and organizations want to control the public’s mindset they will become overly aggressive with their motives. Having a stupid and ignorant population is beneficial for control related purposes.
Conclusion
The controversy over Hunter Biden’s laptop is a complex and divisive issue that continues to be debated and discussed by media outlets, politicians, and the public. While the allegations made in the New York Post’s reporting have not been independently verified, they have had a significant impact on public perception of the Biden family and their business dealings. The controversy also highlights the role that social media and other online platforms can play in shaping public discourse, and the challenges that arise when trying to distinguish between fact and fiction in the digital age. Ultimately, the true impact of the Hunter Biden’s laptop controversy on U.S. politics and society may not be fully understood for some time.